How OTTO answers.
Most AI answers from memory and hopes it remembered right. OTTO answers the way a careful planning professional does: read everything, find the governing passages, quote them, and have the work checked. None of it is optional.
- [01]The documents that govern the site
- [02]The passages that decide it
- [03]An answer that quotes them
- [04]Checked against those passages
- [05]Shown with its evidence, or flagged
The library: read everything that governs.
The planning Acts, the GPDO, the Use Classes Order, the NPPF, and each district's own plans: OTTO holds the full text, and every passage it quotes names the document it came from and whether that document is still in force. The library is kept in step with the official registers, because advice built on a superseded paragraph is worse than no advice.
National law and policy
Your district’s layer
Every document read in full, not summarised.
Retrieval: find the passages that govern the question.
OTTO finds the passages that govern the question, including the policies a site's designations bring into play. Ask about a house in a conservation area and the conservation policies arrive quoted, whether or not you thought to name them.
For the question
How long do we have to submit reserved matters and commence development on an outline planning permission?
- [1]TCPA-1990 · 92 Outline planning permission“(2) Subject to the following provisions of this section, where outline planning permission is granted for development consisting in or including the carrying out of building or other operations, it shall be granted subject to conditions to the effect—(a) that, in the case of any reserved matter, application for approval must be made not later than the expiration of three years beginning with the date of the grant of outline planning permission; and”
- [2]TCPA-1990 · 92 Outline planning permission“(b) that, in the case of outline planning permission for the development of land in England, the development to which the permission relates must be begun not later than the expiration of two years from the final approval of the reserved matters or, in the case of approval on different dates, the final approval of the last such matter to be approved;”
- [3]TCPA-1990 · 92 Outline planning permission“(4) The authority concerned with the terms of an outline planning permission may, in applying subsection (2), substitute, or direct that there be substituted, for the periods ... referred to in that subsection such other periods respectively (whether longer or shorter) as they consider appropriate.”
- [4]TCPA-1990 · 92 Outline planning permission“(5) They may also specify, or direct that there be specified, separate periods under paragraph (a) of subsection (2) in relation to separate parts of the development to which the planning permission relates; and, if they do so, the condition required by paragraph (b) or (c) of that subsection shall then be framed correspondingly by reference to those parts, instead of by reference to the development as a whole.(6) In considering whether to exercise their powers under subsections (4) and (5), the authority shall have regard to the provisions of the development plan and to any other material considerations.”
- [5]TCPA-1990 · 92 Outline planning permission“(3) If outline planning permission is granted without the conditions required by subsection (2), it shall (subject to subsections (3A) to (3D)) be deemed to have been granted subject to those conditions.”
- [6]TCPA-1990 · 92A Extension of outline planning permission etc in event of legal challenge“(1) This section applies where a person is given permission by a court to bring proceedings challenging the validity, in respect of the development of land in England, of—(a) a grant (or deemed grant) of outline planning permission, or(b) the approval of reserved matters under such a permission.(2) Any reserved matters application period or implementation period that is running when the court gives permission to bring the proceedings is extended by one year.”
- [7]TCPA-1990 · 92A Extension of outline planning permission etc in event of legal challenge“(3) If a party to the proceedings is given permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal against a decision determining the challenge, any reserved matters application period or implementation period that is running at that time is extended by one year.(4) If a party to the proceedings is given permission to appeal to the Supreme Court against a decision determining the challenge, any reserved matters application period or implementation period that is running at that time is extended by two years.”
Only these passages may be quoted
The answer: quoted, never paraphrased.
The answer is written only from the retrieved passages, and every claim is tied to a verbatim quotation with its document and paragraph reference. No quote, no claim. This is what one looks like:
Question
How long do we have to submit reserved matters and commence development on an outline planning permission?
[1] TCPA-1990 · 92 Outline planning permission.
“(2) Subject to the following provisions of this section, where outline planning permission is granted for development consisting in or including the carrying out of building or other operations, it shall be granted subject to conditions to the effect—(a) that, in the case of any reserved matter, application for approval must be made not later than the expiration of three years beginning with the date of the grant of outline planning permission; and”
Verified 2 September 2026 · In force · Statute
Verification: checked against the passages it cites.
Before an answer reaches you, every claim in it is checked independently against the passages the answer cites, hunting for anything they do not support. An answer that does not clear that check is shown to you flagged rather than hidden. And when the documents simply do not answer the question, OTTO says so plainly. Declining to guess is a feature: a confident wrong answer is the most expensive thing an AI can give you.
The record behind that answer
Verified
When the check does not clear
Flagged, not verified
The gate: no release without the exam.
The whole system sits an audited exam before any release, and the result is published whether or not the release passed. The latest run scored 100% on citations, and every published answer carries its sources, so it can be relied on and defended as it stands.
What the exam tests
- Cites the right source
- Claims grounded in the documents
- Finds the passage that governs
- Declines unanswerable questions
- Is not caught out
Published either way, pass or fail. The full record is on the benchmark page.