Strategic land runs on policy detail.
The difference between a site and a liability is usually a paragraph.OTTO answers from the district's own development plan, the designations that bind it, and the national policy that tilts it, quoted and dated.
England's constraints, weighed.
The national layer, drawn from the planning register: Green Belt, National Parks, National Landscapes. Then each district's own layer: conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4 directions, allocations. All of it in every answer.
The method, systematic.
The plan, read in full
Every policy, allocation and footnote: 3,508 passages, checked nightly.
The constraints, made explicit
The designations that decide viability, tracked against the register.
The weight, stated
In force beats emerging. Every answer carries the status an argument will actually bear.
The evidence, quoted
Verbatim passages with references, independently checked against their sources, dated against the library.
The developer tier is being built.
On the roadmap: site appraisal workflows, portfolio-wide policy watch, and API access. Tell us where you work and you move those districts up the queue.
The engine behind it is live today:real answers, the benchmark, and the library.